Codon choice can also modulate transcriptional efficiency, translational accuracy, and protein folding. Synonymous substitutions in these regions would be selectively disfavored and thus these regions are characterized by excess synonymous constraint. Protein-coding regions in viral genomes often contain overlapping RNA structural elements, reading frames, regulatory elements, microRNAs, and packaging signals. One approach leverages the synonymous substitution rate as a signature to pinpoint genic regions encoding overlapping or embedded functional elements. Switch#show policy-map interface GigabitEthernet1/0/30Ĭlass-map: AutoQos-4.The increasing availability of sequence data for many viruses provides power to detect regions under unusual evolutionary constraint at a high resolution. Match: dscp af11 (10) af12 (12) af13 (14)Ĭlass-map: AutoQos-4.0-Output-Scavenger-Queue (match-any)Ĭlass-map: AutoQos-4.0-Output-Multimedia-Strm-Queue (match-any) Priority: 30% (30000 kbps), burst bytes 750000,Ĭlass-map: AutoQos-4.0-Output-Control-Mgmt-Queue (match-any)
Service-policy output: AutoQos-4.0-Output-PolicyĬlass-map: AutoQos-4.0-Output-Priority-Queue (match-any) Match: access-group name AutoQos-4.0-Acl-Default Set-dscp-transmit dscp table policed-dscpĬlass-map: AutoQos-4.0-Voip-Signal-CiscoPhone-Class (match-any)Ĭlass-map: AutoQos-4.0-Default-Class (match-any) Service-policy input: AutoQos-4.0-CiscoPhone-Input-PolicyĬlass-map: AutoQos-4.0-Voip-Data-CiscoPhone-Class (match-any) Switch#show policy-map interface GigabitEthernet1/0/34 Service policy is set automatically on each port when applying Cisco AutoQos. I don't know anything about QoS, we are just using Cisco's AutoQos ( shame on me:) ). Here are the policy-map results from some EDF interfaces.
I'll post another reply with policy-map results. What is "short" result ? Is it ok with Fast ethernet ? Gi1/0/34 100M Pair A 0 +/- 1 meters Pair A Normal Gi1/0/30 100M Pair A 0 +/- 1 meters Pair B Normal Gi1/0/28 100M Pair A 0 +/- 1 meters Pair A Normal Interface Speed Local pair Pair length Remote pair Pair status First result is from a switch-to-switch link with no EDF, all the others from "faulty" ip phones links. Here are the results of some TDR tests on interfaces that show EDF. However, all the other threads about Excess Defer frames in C3850 are related to server to server communication at high speed. To verify if the output drops equal to Excess Defer frames are also reported here and in what traffic class they happen. The Defer frames are related to half duplex operation as explained in the following tech note:Įxcess Defer Frames are instead related to bursts of traffic or QoS operation see the following threadĪs suggested by Georg it would be useful to check If the cables are good, there is an interoperability issue with the IP phones.īut the first step is still to verify OSI layer1 (bottom to up layer approach).Įxcess Defer Frames and Defer Frames are not the same thing. Testing the cables is just the first troubleshooting step I suggest just to verify there are no issues with cables.Īs you noted it is unlikely that all the cables going to Mitel IP phones are faulty.
0 kommentar(er)
